On the importance of linguistic turn in law studies
Abstract
The article aims to substantiate the significance of the study of the linguistic turn for the knowledge of legal phenomena, which has been vividly manifested in socio-humanitarian studies since the beginning of the last century. The linguistic turn is viewed as a consequence of the intellectual movement unfolding since the end of the 19th century called “criticism of metaphysics”, which influenced most of the philosophical schools of the 20th century - phenomenology, hermeneutics, existentialism, analytical philosophy, pragmatism and others. The linguistic turnaround arose in the process of criticism of metaphysics as the isolation of philosophical and scientific theories from real life. Lawyers were actively involved in this movement of research thought, since it involves immersion in the direct process of social communication, much of which corresponds to the concept of the subject of legal regulation. The article substantiates the difference between fundamental and applied sciences, in which the object of knowledge and, accordingly, the understanding of truth are not identical. The linguistic turn is considered as one of the ways to ensure the connection of law-making and legal research with a really existing subject of legal regulation and legal practice. It is recognized that in the Russian doctrinal sense of justice there is a lack of immersion in an objectively existing social reality, the most important aspect of which is language. There are examples given here to prove the fact that language is not just a sign system, acting as a means of expressing thoughts about reality, but this reality itself is revealed to a person by those parties and aspects specified by the words used to describe it. The conclusion is made about the need for legal theories and legislative structures to take into account the peculiarities of the Russian legal consciousness, which are reflected in the semantics of the Russian language.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Адыгезалова Г.Э. Социологическая юриспруденция США в XX веке: формирование доктрины, развитие и совершенствование правопорядка. СПб., 2012.
Апресян Ю. Д. Избранные труды. Том ІІ. Интегральное описание и системная лексикография. М., 1995.
Барт Р. Основы семиологии / Структурализм: «за» и «против». М., 1975. – С. 114-163.
Барт Р. Нулевая степень письма. М., 2008.
Бекон Ф. Сочинения в 2-х томах. Т.2. М., 1978.
Виноградов В.В. История слов. М.: РАН. Отделение литературы и языка. 1999.
Декарт Р. Сочинения в 2 тт. Т.1. М., 1989.
Законодательная техника: Научно-практическое пособие. М., Городец, 2000.
Инишев И. «Иконический поворот» в теориях культуры и общества / Логос, 2012, № 1 (85). – С. 184-211.
Коновалова Н.И. Эмоциональная и рациональная оценка в народной фитонимии / Рациональное и эмоциональное в русском языке: Межвузовский сб-к научных трудов. М., 2012. С. 259-266.
Левушкин И.Н. Брачный договор в Российской Федерации. М., 2016.
Семнов Ю.В. Этимологический словарь русского языка. М, 2003.
Синюков В.Н., Синюкова Т.В. О развитии университетского и прикладного юридического образования в России // Государство и право, 2010, № 3. С. 33-42.
Туранин В.Ю. Использование заимствованной терминологии в текстах современных российских законов: возможности и пределы / Современное право, 2009, № 4. – С. 14-17.
Хайдеггер М. Путь к языку / Хайдеггер М. Время и бытие: Статьи и выступления. М., 1993. – С. 259-272.
Хайдеггер М. Письмо о гуманизме / Хайдеггер М. Время и бытие: Статьи и выступления. М., 1993. – С. 192-220.
Rorty R. (Ed.). The Linguistic Turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
References
Adygezalova, G.E. (2012). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the XX century: the formation of the doctrine, development and improvement of the rule of law. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
Apresyan, Yu. D. (1995). Selected Works. Volume ІІ. Integral description and systemic lexicography. Moscow (in Russian).
Bart, R. (1975). Basics of semiology / Structuralism: “pros” and “cons”. Moscow (in Russian).
Bart, R. (2008). Zero degree letters. Moscow (in Russian).
Bacon, F. (1978). Works in 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow (in Russian).
Vinogradov, V.V. (1999). History of words. Moscow. Russian Academy of Science. Department of literature and language (in Russian).
Descartes, R. (1989). Works in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russian).
Legislative technique. Scientific and practical guide. (2000). Moscow. Gorodets (in Russian).
Inishev, I. (2012). “The Iconic Turn” in the Theories of Culture and Society. Logos, 1(85), 184-211 (in Russian).
Konovalova, N.I. (2012). Emotional and rational evaluation in folk phytonym. Rational and emotional in Russian. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Moscow (in Russian).
Levushkin, I.N. (2016). Marriage contract in the Russian Federation. Moscow (in Russian).
Semnov, Y.V. (2003). Etymological dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow (in Russian).
Sinyukov, V.N., Sinyukova, T.V. (2010). On the development of university and applied legal education in Russia. State and Law, 3, 33-42 (in Russian).
Turanin, V.Yu. (2009). The use of borrowed terminology in the texts of modern Russian laws: possibilities and limits. Modern Law, 4, 14-17 (in Russian).
Heidegger, M. (1993a). Path to language (Pp. 259-272). In: Time and Being: Articles and speeches. Moscow (in Russian).
Heidegger, M. (1993b). Letter on Humanism (Pp. 192-220). In: Time and Being: Articles and speeches. Moscow (in Russian).
Rorty, R. (1967). The Linguistic Turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Copyright (c) 2019 Рафаил Насыров
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).