Theoretical framework of diagnostic techniques of legal authorship examination (on the material of written interpersonal electronic communication)
Abstract
The article discusses the Internet discourse in the aspect of authorship problems. The article outlines the specific features of modern computer communication, the genre features of interpersonal correspondence that affects the language of electronic messages. It is argued that in the Internet discourse the speech skills of the authors are manifested specifically, which requires a different approach to the study of authorship in this sphere of communication. Some features to be noted by the expert when working with Internet communications are singled out. The article presents the results of the analysis of messages in social networks and messengers, the purpose of which was to identify speech features that indicate the specific biological and social characteristics of the authors. Messages in social networks and instant messengers are treated as phenomena of the same order, since they are close functionally, since they serve mainly for the informal exchange of information between recipients familiar with each other, and presuppose primarily written dialog. The case study analyses messages written by men and women aged 12 to 72 years old, with different education, employed in various spheres, both citizens of Russia and other countries. The analysis revealed lexical, phraseological, grammatical, stylistic, spelling, punctuation features of the authors' messages, depending on their age, place of birth, knowledge of the Russian language, level of education and general culture, job and occupation. The characteristic features of the lexical level are recognized as the most illustrative. The article argues that not only linguistic methods proper but also statistical, quantitative methods should be applied the analysis of the Internet communication.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Бринев К. И. «Русский, решай…». Юрислингвистика-6: Инвективное и манипулятивное функционирование языка. Барнаул, 2005. – С. 290-303.
Верхозин С. С. К вопросу о лингвотеоретических основах методик авторизации текста. Ученые записки Забайкальского государственного университета. Серия: Филология, история, востоковедение. Чита, 2013. Вып. 2 (49). URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-lingvoteoreticheskih-osnovah-metodik-avtorizatsii-teksta
Вул С. М. Судебно-автороведческая идентификационная экспертиза: методические основы. Xарьков, 2007.
Горошко Е. И. Изучение электронного дискурса в судебном речеведении. 2004. URL: http://www.textology.ru/article.aspx?aId=44
Горошко Е. И. Современные интернет-коммуникации: структура и основные характеристики. М.., 2012. URL: http://www.textology.ru/article.aspx?aId=232
Грановский Г. Л. Использование признаков письменной речи в криминалистической экспертизе. М., 1976.
Кожина М. Н., Дускаева Л. Р., Салимовский В. Я. Стилистика русского языка. М., 2012.
Красса С. И. Методика и инструментарий атрибуции текста в автороведческой экспертизе. Тамбов 2013. URL: http://www.gramota.net/materials/1/2013/10/30.html
Лебедева Н. Б. Естественная письменная русская речь как объект лингвистического исследования. Барнаул, 2001. URL: http://www.uni-altai.ru/Journal/vestbspu/2001/gumanit/PDF/lebedeva.pdf
Прокуровская Н. А. Город в зеркале своего языка: На языковом материале г. Ижевска. Ижевск, 1996.
Романов А. С., Мещеряков Р. В. Определение пола автора короткого электронного сообщения. Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии: сб. Междунар. конф. по компьютерной лингвистике "Диалог". 2011. URL: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2011/materials/ru/pdf/55.pdf
Рыжкова Е. С. Проблемы автороведческой классификационной экспертизы текстов интернет-коммуникации. Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. Тамбов, 2015. № 6 (48): в 2-х ч. Ч. I. – C. 130-133.
Туманова К. С. Алгоритм классификации текстов на русском языке по возрасту и гендерному признаку автора. СПб., 2011. URL: http://se.math.spbu.ru/SE/diploma/2011/Tumanova%20Kristina%20-%20slides.pdf
Черенкова А. Д. Русская диалектология. Воронеж, 2014.
References
Brinev, K. I. (2005). Russian, decide… [Russkij, reshaj…]. Invektivnoe i manipulyativnoe funkcionirovanie yazyka. Invective and manipulative functioning of a language. Legal Linguistics, 6, 290-303 (n Russian).
Verhozin, S. S. (2013). To the question of linguistic-theoretical foundations of text authorization techniques [K voprosu o lingvoteoreticheskih osnovah metodik avtorizacii teksta]. Uchenye zapiski Zabajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya, istoriya, vostokovedenie. – Scientific notes of the Transbaikal State University. Series: Philology, History, Oriental Studies. Chita, 2(49). Available from: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-lingvoteoreticheskih-osnovah-metodik-avtorizatsii-teksta (in Russian).
Vul, S. M. (2007). Forensic identification of experts: methodological foundations [Sudebno-avtorovedcheskaya identifikacionnaya ekspertiza: metodicheskie osnovy]. Xar'kov (in Russian).
Goroshko, E. I. (2004). The study of electronic discourse in forensic science [Izuchenie elektronnogo diskursa v sudebnom rechevedenii]. Available from: http://www.textology.ru/article.aspx?aId=44 (in Russian).
Goroshko, E. I. (2012). Modern Internet communications: structure and basic characteristics [Sovremennye internet-kommunikacii: struktura i osnovnye harakteristiki]. Moscow. Available from: http://www.textology.ru/article.aspx?aId=232 (in Russian).
Granovskij, G. L. (1976), Use of signs of written speech in forensic examination [Ispol'zovanie priznakov pis'mennoj rechi v kriminalisticheskoj ekspertize]. Moscow (in Russian).
Kozhina, M. N., Duskaeva, L. R., Salimovskij, V. Ya. (2012). Stylistics of the Russian language [Stilistika russkogo yazyka]. Moscow (in Russian).
Krassa, S. I. (2013). Methodology and toolkit for text attribution in expert analysis [Metodika i instrumentarij atribucii teksta v avtorovedcheskoj ekspertize]. Tambov. Available from: http://www.gramota.net/materials/1/2013/10/30.html (in Russian).
Lebedeva, N. B. (2001). Natural written Russian speech as an object of linguistic research [Yestestvennaya pis'mennaya russkaya rech' kak ob"yekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya]. Barnaul. Available from: http://www.uni-altai.ru/Journal/vestbspu/2001/gumanit/PDF/lebedeva.pdf (in Russian).
Prokurovskaya, N. A. (1996). The city in the mirror of its own language: On the language material of Izhevsk [Gorod v zerkale svoyego yazyka: Na yazykovom materiale goroda Izhevska. Izhevsk (in Russian).
Romanov, A. S. (2011). Meshcheryakov R. V. Sex determination of the author of a short electronic message [Opredeleniye pola avtora korotkogo elektronnogo soobshcheniya]. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nyye tekhnologii: sb. Mezhdunar. konf. po komp'yuternoy lingvistike “Dialog” – Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies. Proceed. Int. Sc. Conf. on Computer Linguistics “Dialogue”. Available from: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2011/materials/ru/pdf/55.pdf (in Russian).
Ryzhkova, Ye. S. (2015). Problems of the authoring classification examination of texts of Internet communication [Problemy avtorovedcheskoy klassifikatsionnoy ekspertizy tekstov internet-kommunikatsii]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice , 6(48), I, 130-133 (in Russian).
Tumanova, K. S. (2011). Algorithm for the classification of texts in Russian by age and gender of the author [Algoritm klassifikatsii tekstov na russkom yazyke po vozrastu i gendernomu priznaku avtora]. St. Petersburg. Available from: http://se.math.spbu.ru/SE/diploma/2011/Tumanova%20Kristina%20-%20slides.pdf (in Russian).
Cherenkova, A. D. (2014). Russian dialectology [Russkaya dialektologiya]. Voronezh (in Russian).
Copyright (c) 2019 Екатерина Жданова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
