THREAT IN THE POLITICAL DISCOURSE OF A SOCIAL NETWORK AS A MEANS OF SPEECH INFLUENCE

Keywords: political discourse, menacing-speech-act, indirect threat, direct threat, manipulation, political background, microcontext, speech influence

Abstract

The article discusses the mechanisms of speech influence of political discourse based on conflictogenic texts of mensive nature. The strategies, methods and tactics of the addressee, which determine the pragmatic orientation of the statements of politicians on the social network, are defined and characterized. A detailed analysis of the speaker’s intentions, realized at the lexical, grammatical and stylistic levels and having a strong persuasive effect, is carried out . The language of a politician correlates with the speech organization of the picture of the world, which forms certain opinions regarding events or personalities in the mass consciousness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Darya Korotaeva , Southern Federal University

undergraduate student

Lilit Mesropyan, Southern Federal University

Candidate of philological Sciences, associate Professor of the Department of language theory and Russian

References

Баранов А.Н. Введение в прикладную лингвистику. – М., 2001.

Демьянков В.З. Политический дискурс: история и современные исследования. – М., 2002. – С. 32-43.

Долинин К.А. Имплицитное содержание высказывания / Вопросы языкознания. – 1983. – № 6. – С. 38-43.

Ерофеева Е.В. Речевые акты угрозы и предупреждения и их косвенная реализация во французском дискурсе / Политическая лингвистика. – 2014. – № 4(50). – URL: https://ru.booksc.xyz/ireader/50774592

Колшанский Г.В. О природе контекста / Вопросы языкознания. – 1959. – № 4. – С. 47-53.

Серль Дж. Что такое речевой акт / Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 17. – М., 1986. – С. 151-169.

Серль Дж. Косвенные речевые акты / Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XVII. – М., 1986. – С.195-222.

Шейгал Е.И. Семиотика политического дискурса. – М., 2004.

References

Baranov, A.N. (2001). Introduction to Applied Linguistics. Moscow (in Russian).

Demyankov, V.Z. (2002). Political discourse: history and modern research, 32-34 (in Russian).

Dolinin, K.A. (1983). Implicit content of utterance. Questions of linguistics, 6, 38-43 (in Russian).

Erofeeva, E.V. (2014). Threat and warning speech acts and their indirect implementation in French discourse / Political Linguistics, 4 (50). Available from: https://ru.booksc.xyz/ireader/50774592 (in Russian).

Kolshansky, G.V. (1959). On the nature of the context. Questions of linguistics, 4, 47-53 (in Russian).

Searle, J. (1986). What is a speech act. New in foreign linguistics, 17, 151-169 (in Russian).

Searle, J. (1986). Indirect speech acts. New in foreign linguistics, 17, 195-222 (in Russian).

Sheigal, E. I. (2004). Semiotics of political discourse. Moscow. (in Russian).

Published
2020-07-01
How to Cite
Korotaeva , D., & Mesropyan, L. (2020). THREAT IN THE POLITICAL DISCOURSE OF A SOCIAL NETWORK AS A MEANS OF SPEECH INFLUENCE. Legal Linguistics, (16 (27), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2020)1604
Section
Speech Offenses