Communication in Social Networks: Factors of Potential Conflicts
Abstract
Social networks are a relatively new type of communication that has its own specificity. The article raises the problem of communication in the social network in terms of potentialconflicts. The analysis of modern judicial practice has shown that the number of proceedings in which communication in the social network has played a significant role is increasing. The factors of network interaction that influence the emergence and development of conflict are considered. The factors of conflict communication in social networks include the following: 1) lack of differentiation between the features publicity/ privacy, resulting from the hybridization of language models and means of public and private communication; 2) lack of non-verbal means of communication, which is partly, but not fully enough, compensated through specific ideographic sign system ofthe Internet communication; 3) round-the-clock network availability and, in this regard,extended communication time, which generatesunlimited communication,provoking decrease of self-control and diversity in time; 4) the weakening of traditional ethical prohibitions for communicationat distance as a result of an attempt to use various images and cultural codes that reflect them in face-to-face communication, including those that differ from those inherent to face-to-face communication; 5) stylistic degradation of the speech culture of communication, manifested in two types: the use of lower-range vocabulary to imitate colloquial discursive practice and the use of colloquial, slang, taboo language units for the purpose of speech aggression,verbal insult. Awareness of the causes of speech conflicts in social networks, often leading to the violation of legal rules and to legal proceedings, minimizes the risk of its occurrence and makes it possible to get the maximum benefit from the new communication means provided by the technological progress.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Адаева О.Б., Иваненко Г.С. От целеполагания к условиям реализации: о концепции курса русского языка в школе / Вестник Челябинского государственного педагогического университета. – 2015. – № 10. – С. 14-20.
Биркенбил В. Язык интонации, мимики, жестов. СПб.,2014.
Введенская Л.А., Павлова А.Г. Культура и искусство речи. Современная риторика. Ростов-на-Дону, 2015.
Глухих Н.В. Диалогичность как типологический признак эпистолярного делового текста конца XVIII - начала XIX века / Проблемы истории, филологии, культуры. – 2008. – № 19. – С. 362-374.
Глухих Н.В., Миронова А.А. Приемы формирования коммуникативной компетенции будущего учителя в деловом общении. / Вестник Челябинского государственного педагогического университета. –2019. – № 4. – С. 91-101.
Гуль А.Ю. Роль социальных сетей в современных коммуникативных практиках/ Культурологические чтения – 2016 / Материалы международных научно-практических конференций. Екатеринбург, 2016. – С.52-56. URL: http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/43311/1/kulch_2016_10.pdf
Горелов И.Н. Невербальные компоненты коммуникации. М., 2015.
Иваненко Г.С. Формирование представления о динамических процессах в языке и языкознании как средство становления гуманитарного мышления / Мир науки, культуры, образования. – 2019. – № 6 (79). – С. 472-475.
Иваненко Г.С. Лексикография и судебная лингвистическая экспертиза: перспективы взаимодействия. / Юрислингвистика. – 2018. – №7/8 (18/19). С. – 98-118. URL: https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2018)7-810
Иваненко Г.С. Еще раз о «неприличной форме выражения» / Юрислингвистика. – 2013. – №2 (13). – С. 92-96.
Иваненко Г.С. Анализ формы речевого воздействия на адресата как аспект судебного исследования экстремистского текста
/ Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. – 2013. – № 4-2 (22). – С. 82-87.
Иваненко Г.С. Склонение к совершению самоубийства / доведение до самоубийства: лингвистическая трактовка дифференциации содержания ст. 110 и ст.110.1. УК РФ. Юрислингвистика. – 2019. – № 14 (25). – С. 14-18. URL: https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2019)1403
Кнапп М.Л. Невербальные коммуникации. М., 2013.
Стернин И.А. Деловое общение / Учебное пособие для старшеклассников и студентов. – Воронеж, 2009.
Шипицин А.И. Феномен социальных сетей в современной культуре / Известия ВГПУ. – 2011. – № 3(57). – С. 36-40.
References
Adaeva, O.B., Ivanenko, G.S. (2015). From goal-setting to implementation conditions: on the concept of the Russian language course at school.Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 10,14-20(inRussiаn).
Birkenbil, V. (2014).Language of intonation, facial expressions, gestures. St. Petersburg (inRussiаn).
Vvedenskaya, L.A., Pavlova, A.G. (2015). Culture and art of speech.Contemporary rhetoric.Rostov-on-Don (inRussiаn).
Glukhikh, N.V. (2008). Dialogue as a typological feature of an epistolary business text of the late 18th - early 19th centuries.Problems of history, philology, culture, 19, 362-374 (inRussiаn).
Glukhikh, N.V., Mironova, A.A. (2019). Techniques for the formation of the future teacher's communicative competence in business communication.Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 4, 91-101(inRussiаn).
Gul,A.Yu.(2016). The role of social networks in modern communication practices. Cultural readings – 2016. Materials of international scientific and practical conferences. Yekaterinburg, 52-56. URL: http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/43311/1/kulch_2016_10.pdf (inRussiаn).
Gorelov, I.N. (2015).Non-verbal communication components.Moscow (inRussiаn).
Ivanenko, G.S. (2019). Formation of an idea of dynamic processes in language and linguistics as a means of the formation of humanitarian thinking.The world of science, culture, education, 6 (79), 472-475(inRussiаn).
Ivanenko, G.S. (2018). Lexicography and forensic linguistic examination: prospects for interaction. Legal linguistics, 7/8 (18/19), 98-118. URL: https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2018)7-810 (inRussiаn).
Ivanenko, G.S. (2013). Once again about the "indecent form of expression".Legal linguistics, 2 (13), 92-96(inRussiаn).
Ivanenko, G.S. (2013). Analysis of the form of speech influence on the addressee as an aspect of judicial research of an extremist text.Philological sciences.Questions of theory and practice, 4-2 (22), 82-87 (inRussiаn).
Ivanenko, G.S. (2019). Inclination to commit suicide / drive to suicide: a linguistic interpretation of the differentiation of the content of Art. 110 and Article 110.1. Of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.Legal linguistics, 14 (25), 14-18. URL: https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2019)1403 (inRussiаn).
Knapp, M.L. (2013). Non-verbal communication.Moscow (inRussiаn).
Sternin, I.A. (2009).Business communication.Textbook for high school students.Voronezh(inRussiаn).
Shipitsin,A.I. (2011). The phenomenon of social networks in modern culture.IzvestiyaVGPU, 3 (57), 36-40 (inRussiаn).
Copyright (c) 2020 Галина Иваненко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
