Discursive Strategies in Authorship Studies of Sexting
УДК 81-26, ББК 81.2
Abstract
The article covers the description of expertise practice in the authorship study of sexting in order to solve identification problems. The existing research problems caused by the peculiarities of electronic communication are described. The study of orthographic and punctuation features of speech skills, as well as the study of syntactic structures do not provide reliable results of authorship. Therefore, the study of discursive strategies for conducting a dialogue is of great importance. The paper proposes a model for studying speech strategies and tactics of sexting, in particular, the tactics of self-presentation of the participant in the correspondence, the tactics of announcing the topic and persuasive tactics, ways of expressing key concepts of the dialogue and the assessments of the interlocutor. The listed features, according to the authors of the study, form a unique speech portrait of a linguistic personality, which has a forensically significant identification potential.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Бельская Н. С. Речевой жанр секстинга в судебной лингвистической экспертизе интернет-коммуникации при расследовании преступлений против половой неприкосновенности и половой свободы личности / Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. – 2015. – № 1 (61). – Т. 2. – С. 170-176.
Вул С. М. Судебно-автороведческая идентификационная экспертиза: методические основы: Методическое пособие. Xарьков, 2007.
Дементьев В. В. Теория речевых жанров. М., 2010.
Зайцева О., Зобнина Н. Коммуникативные тактики сексуального онлайн взаимодействия (на материале секстинга и порномести) / Международные и национальные тенденции и перспективы развития судебной экспертизы. Сборник докладов. Н. Новгород, 2019. – С. 154-160.
Иссерс О. С. Коммуникативные стратегии и тактики русской речи. Омск, 1999.
Комиссаров А. Ю. Криминалистическое исследование письменной речи с использованием ЭВМ. М., 2003.
Литневская Е. И. Письменные формы разговорной речи (К постановке проблемы). М., 2011.
Паршина О. Н. Российская политическая речь: теория и практика. М., 2012.
Секераж Т. Н. Судебная психологическая экспертиза информационных материалов: теория и практика. М., 2021.
Щербинина Ю. В. Педагогический дискурс: типическое и архетипическое / Наука и школа. ‒ 2010. ‒ №2. ‒ С. 36-40.
Янко Т. Е. Коммуникативные стратегии русской речи. М., 2001.
Copyright (c) 2024 Светлана Доронина, Ирина Мурса
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
