The Speech Act of Threat in Various Communicative Situations

Keywords: speech act, threat, communicative situation

Abstract

The paper attempts to identify common features characteristic of the expression of a threat in different communicative situations, as well as to describe the circumstances affecting the choice of certain language means to express threat. The direct and indirect forms of speech aggression seen as threat are studied in four spheres: political, business, everyday vernacular and mass media. We used data obtained by the method of continuous sampling from the Internet as material for the study: screenshots of personal correspondence, posts on social networks, photographs of paper media. In all these data, the speech act of the threat is recorded in writing and represents a threat-warning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Elena Yurina, Altay state university

undergraduate 

Svetlana Doronina, Altay state university

Head of the Department of General and Applied Philology, Literature and Russian Language, Altai State University

References

Баранов А.Н. Феномен угрозы в лингвистической теории и экспертной практике / Теория и практика судебной экспертизы. – 2014. – №4(36). – С. 139-147.

Безяева М.Г. Семантика коммуникативного уровня звучащей речи. М., 2002.

Вежбицка А. Речевые жанры [в свете теории элементарных смысловых единиц]/ Антология речевых жанров. М., 2007.

References

Baranov, A.N. (2014) The phenomenon of threat in linguistic theory and expert practice / Theory and practice of forensic examination, 4 (36), 139-147. Moscow (in Russian).

Bezyaeva, M.G. (2002) Semantics of the communicative level of sounding speech. Moscow (in Russian).

Vezhbitska, A. (2007) Speech genres [in the light of the theory of elementary semantic units] / Anthology of speech genres. Moscow (in Russian).

Published
2021-07-01
How to Cite
Yurina, E., & Doronina, S. (2021). The Speech Act of Threat in Various Communicative Situations. Legal Linguistics, (20(31), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2021)2004
Section
Linguo-conflictology