SOME FEATURES OF INTERROGATION IN TRIAL JURY ACCORDING TO LEGAL LINGUISTICS
Abstract
The article discusses the necessity of understanding the provisions of the criminal procedure law from the point of view of legal linguistics, as well as the adaptation of legal terms and actions, including the formulation of questions during interrogation and for the verdict, for ordinary citizens, who may act as jurors.
To solve this problem, it is proposed to ensure a combination of discretionary powers of the judge to formulate questions with giving the parties the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the written questions of jurors, as well as the possibility of objection in case of unjustified exclusion of these by the presiding judge. In addition, it is necessary to clarify of the requirements to the content of the instruction given by the presiding judge and addressing the assizers the only question about the guilt or innocence of the defendant.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Архив Ленинградского областного суда, уголовные дела №2-8/18, 2-32/18, 2-5/2019.
Бабенко Г. Большой толковый словарь русских существительных. URL: https://noun_ru.academic.ru/5813/напоминание (дата обращения 26.11.2018).
Галяшина Е.И. Феномен судебного речеведения: Наука - экспертиза – обучение // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина. 2015. №12.
Дубровская Т.В. Судья: речевое поведение в судебном дискурсе // Дискурс-Пи, 2016. №1.
Казанцев С.М. Суд присяжных в России: Громкие уголовные процессы 1864-1917 гг. СПб., 1991.
Обзор по делам, рассмотренными судами с участием присяжных заседателей в 2003 году, утвержденного Судебной коллегией по уголовным делам ВС РФ 01.06.2004 г. URL: http://ппвс.рф/2004/obzor-sudebnoy-praktiki-vs-rf/2004.06.01-prisyajnye.html (дата обращения 26.11.2018).
Первый постсоветский суд присяжных. URL: https://pravo.ru/process/view/24686/ (дата обращения 26.11.2018).
Петухов Е.Н. Коррекционное толкование отдельных положений уголовно-процессуального закона как средство уяснения их точного смысла и правильного применения // Юрислингвистика, 2016. № 5.
References
Arkhiv Leningradskogo oblastnogo suda. (2019). Ugolovnye dela 2-8/18, 2-32/18, and 2-5/2019 (in Russian).
Babenko G. Bol'shoi tolkovyi slovar' russkikh sushchestvitel'nykh. (2009). Available from: https://noun_ru.academic.ru/5813/напоминание (in Russian).
Dubrovskaya, T.V. (2016). Judge: speech behavior in judicial discourse [Sud'ya: rechevoe povedenie v sudebnom diskurse]. Diskurs-Pi – Discourse P, 1 (in Russian).
First Post-Soviet jury trial. (2018). [Pervyj postsovetskij sud prisyazhnyh]. Available from: https://pravo.ru/process/view/24686/ (in Russian).
Galyashina, E.I. (2015). The phenomenon of judicial speech: Science-expertise-training [Fenomen sudebnogo rechevedeniya: Nauka-ehkspertiza–obuchenie]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina – Bulletin of the University of O.E. Kutafin, 12 (in Russian).
Kazancev, S.M. (1991). Jury trial in Russia: high-Profile criminal trials of 1864-1917 [Sud prisyazhnyh v Rossii: Gromkie ugolovnye processy 1864-1917]. Saint Petersburg (in Russian).
Obzor po delam, rassmotrennymi sudami s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedatelei v 2003 godu. (2004). Sudebnaya kollegiya po ugolovnym delam VS RF 01.06.2004. Available from: http://ppvs.rf/2004/obzor-sudebnoy-praktiki-vs-rf/2004.06.01-prisyajnye.html/ (in Russian)
Petuhov, E.N. (2016). Correctional interpretation of certain provisions of the criminal procedure law as a means of understanding their exact meaning and correct application [Korrekcionnoe tolkovanie otdel'nyh polozhenij ugolovno-processual'nogo zakona kak sredstvo uyasneniya ih tochnogo smysla i pravil'nogo primeneniya]. Yurislingvistika – Legal linguistics, 5 (in Russian).
Copyright (c) 2019 Evgenia Zeidlits
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
