Means of Expressing Causality in Russian and English Legal Texts
УДК 343.01, ББК 67.408
Abstract
The article concentrates on the study of means of expressing causality in Russian and English legal texts. Legal texts are characterized by the use of different means which serve logical cohesion. Structures with semantics of reason are frequently employed. The sources for the research are Russian and English textbooks on Civil Procedure. Aanalysis of the lexical and grammatical means of expressing causality in Russian and English has been carried out. The article considers functional words and notional words with causative meaning. In both languages the category of notional words with causative meaning is represented mostly by verbs. Nouns with causative semantics are used less often. Function words denoting causality in Russian include derivative prepositions and conjunctions. In English function words include conjunctions and less frequently ˗ prepositions. The paper also examines non-finite verbs expressing causal relationship: adverbial participles in Russian and gerunds in English. Set phrases are registered as a means of expressing causality too. The means of expressing effect have been singled out. Apart from complex sentences with subordinates of cause there also exist complex sentences with syncretic meaning of cause. They are mostly sentences expressing both cause and explanation or cause and condition. The frequency of use of particular means with causative meaning depends on a particular language. Prepositional constructions with causal meaning are typical of Russian legal texts, while complex sentences with adverbial clauses of reason are common in Legal English.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Алексеева И. С. Профессиональный тренинг переводчика. СПб, 2005.
Архипова И. В., Шустова С. В. Межкатегориальное взаимодействие в функциональной грамматике: монография. Пермь, 2021. URL: http://www.psu.ru/files/docs/science/books/mono/arhipova-shustova-mezhkategorialnoe-vzaimodejstvie-v-funkcionalnoj-grammatike.pdf
Баклагова Ю. В. К вопросу о каузальности и каузативности в системе языка / Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия 2: Филология и искусствоведение. - 2008. - №10. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-kauzalnosti-i-kauzativnosti-v-sisteme-yazyka
Ветчинова Т. С. Изменения в системе сложного предложения функционально-семантического поля причины в языке русской лирики XIX-XX веков: диссертация ... кандидата филологических наук: 10.02.01. Орел, 2009.
Гун Цзинсун. Семантические особенности производных предлогов в современном русском языке / Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. – 2016. - № 9(63): в 3-х ч. - Ч. 2. - C. 84-88.
Ивин А. А., Никитина И. П. Философия науки: уч. пос. М., 2025.
Заика Н. М. Полипредикативные причинные конструкции в языках мира: пространство типологических возможностей / Вопросы языкознания. - 2019. – № 4. С. 7–32
Калятин И. С. Анализ грамматических средств выражения причины в немецком, итальянском и русском научном тексте XXI века / Litera. – 2020. – № 8. – С. 127–143. – URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33476
Шмыкалова И. А. Производные предлоги в связи с, по причине и их текстовые парадигмы в аспекте речевой конкуренции: дисс. … к. филол. н. Нижний Новгород, 2015.
Филимонова Н. Г. Каузальность и знаменательная лексика в английском языке / Современные научные исследования и инновации. 2016. № 4 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2016/04/67036 (дата обращения: 23.12.2024).
Copyright (c) 2025 Екатерина Дегтярева, Надежда Калмазова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).