Speech Portrait of Personality as a Tool of Forensic AuthorshipAttribution
Abstract
The article discussesapplication of speech portraitpotential in forensic authorship attribution. An illustrative example is the speech portraits of Russian vernacular native speakers of different ages and genders living in the same language community - the village of Kamyshenka, Altai Krai. The results of the study can be used for speech identification within the framework forensic authorship attribution, since the described lexical and grammatical features of the speech of each respondent form unique combinations that allow for the identification procedure. The nature of the narrative strategies in the structure of the speech portrait is also established, which are no less, if sometimes even a more informative feature of the speech portrait of a linguistic persona than the lexical and grammatical features of the speech.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Богин Г.И. Концепция языковой личности: автореф. дис. д. филол. наук. М., 1982.
Брокмейер И., Харре Р. Нарратив: проблемы и обещания одной альтернативной парадигмы / Вопросы философии. - 2000 - № 3. – С. 29-32.
Винокур Т.Г. Речевой портрет современного человека / Человек в системе наук. М., 1989.
Вул С.М. Судебно-автороведческая идентификационная экспертиза: методические основы: Методическое пособие.Xарьков, 2007.
Гафарова А.С. Речевой портрет: социолингвистические характеристики: автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук. Тверь, 2006.
Гордеева М.Н. Речевой портрет и способы его описания / Лингвостилистические и лингводидактические проблемы коммуникации. №6 М., 2008. С. 89-101.
Ерофеева Т.И. «Речевой портрет» говорящего / Языковой облик уральского города. Свердловск, 1990. С. 90-103.
Земская Е.А. Речевой портрет ребенка (К вопросу о системности некодифицированных сфер устной речи) / Язык: система и подсистемы: К 70-летию М. В. Панова М., 1990. С. 241-260.
Капанадзе Л.А. Современное городское просторечие и литературный язык / Городское просторечие. Проблемы изучения. М., 1984. С.5-12.
Китайгородская М.В., Розанова Н.Н. Русский речевой портрет. Фонохрестоматия. М., 1995.
Крысин Л.П. Социолингвистические аспекты изучения современного русского языка. М., 1989.
Мамаева С.В. Речевой портрет коллективной языковой личности школьников 5-7-х классов :автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук. Кемерово, 2007.
Матвеева Г.Г. Скрытые грамматические значения и идентификация социального лица («портрета») говорящего: автореф.дис. д-ра филол. наук. СПб., 1993.
Николаева Т.М. «Социолингвистический портрет» и методы его описания // Русский язык и современность. Проблемы и перспективы развития русистики. Доклады Всесоюзной научной конференции. Часть 2. М., 1991. С. 73-75.
Панов М.В. История русского литературного произношения XVIII-ХХ вв. М., 1990.
Парсамова В.Я. Языковая личность ученого в эпистолярных текстах (на материале писем Ю.М. Лотмана): автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук. Саратов, 2004.
Пауфошима Р.Ф. О произносительной манере А. А. Реформатского / Язык и личность. М., 1989.
Сапогов В.А. Все нарисованное было в девятисотые годы» /О Игоре Северянине. Череповец, 1987. С. 31-33.
Седов К.Ф. Типы языковых личностей и стратегии речевого поведения (о риторике бытового конфликта) / Вопросы стилистики. Язык и человек. Саратов 1996. Вып.26. С.8-14.
Седов К.Ф. Дискурс и личность: эволюция коммуникативной компетенции. М., 2004.
Соломина Е.В. Об особенностях идиолексикона носителя городского просторечия / Вестник Томского государственного университета. – 2013.– № 374. – C. 37-41.
Тарасенко Т.П. Языковая личность старшеклассника в аспекте ее речевых реализаций (на материале данных ассоциативного эксперимента и социолекта школьников Краснодара): автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук. Краснодар, 2007.
Тюпа В.И. Нарративная стратегия романа / Новый филологический вестник. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 9.
Черняк В.Д. Речевой портрет носителя просторечия / Современный русский язык: Социальная и функциональная дифференциация. М., 2003. С. 497-513.
References
Bogin, G.I. (1982) The concept of linguistic personality. Moscow (in Russian).
Brockmeyer I., Harre, R. (2000) Narrative: problems and promises of one alternative paradigm. Problems of Philosophy, 3, 29-32 (in Russian).
Chernyak, V.D. (2003) Speech portrait of the native speaker. Modern Russian. Social and functional differentiation. Moscow, 497-513 (in Russian).
Erofeeva, T. I. (1990) "Speech portrait" of the speaker. Linguistic appearance of the Ural city. Sverdlovsk, 90-103 (in Russian).
Gafarova, A.S. (2006) Speech portrait: sociolinguistic characteristics.Tver (in Russian).
Gordeeva, M.N. (2008) Speech portrait and ways of describing it. Lingvo-stylistic and linguodidactic problems of communication, 6, 89-101.Moscow(in Russian).
Kapanadze, L.A. (1984) Modern urban vernacular and literary language. Urban vernacular. Learning problems,5-12.Moscow(in Russian).
Kitaygorodskaya, M. V., Rozanova, N. N. (1995) Russian speech portrait. Phono-restomacy. Moscow (in Russian).
Krysin, L.P. (1989) Sociolinguistic aspects of studying the modern Russian language. Moscow(in Russian).
Mamaeva, S.V. (2007) Speech portrait of the collective linguistic personality of schoolchildren in grades 5-7. Kemerovo (in Russian).
Matveeva, G.G. (1993) Latent grammatical meanings and identification of a social person ("portrait") of the speaker. St. Petersburg(in Russian).
Nikolaeva, T.M. (1991) "Sociolinguistic portrait" and methods of its description. Russian language and modernity. Problems and prospects for the development of Russian studies. Reports of the All-Union Scientific Conference, 2,73-75.Moscow(in Russian).
Panov, M.V. (1990) History of Russian literary pronunciation of the 18th-20th centuries. Moscow(in Russian).
Parsamova, V.Ya. (2004) Linguistic personality of a scientist in epistolary texts (based on letters from Yu.M. Lotman). Saratov (in Russian).
Paufoshima, R.F. (1989) On the pronunciation manner of A.A. Reformatsky. Language and personality. Moscow(in Russian).
Sapogov, V.A. (1987) Everything that was painted was in the nine hundredth years”. About Igor Severyanin,31-33.Cherepovets (in Russian).
Sedov K.F. (1996) Types of linguistic personalities and strategies of speech behavior (on the rhetoric of everyday conflict). Questions of stylistics. Language and man, 8-14.Saratov(in Russian).
Sedov, K.F. (2004) Discourse and personality: the evolution of communicative competence. Moscow (in Russian).
Solomina, E.V. (2013) On the features of the idiolexicon of the bearer of urban vernacular. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University, 374,37-41 (in Russian).
Tarasenko, T.P. (2007) Linguistic personality of a high school student in the aspect of its speech realizations (based on the data of an associative experiment and sociolect of schoolchildren in Krasnodar. Krasnodar (in Russian).
Tyupa, V.I. (2011) Narrative strategy of the novel. New philological bulletin, 3, 9 (in Russian).
Vinokur, T.G. (1989) Speech portrait of a modern person.Man in the system of sciences. Moscow, 504 (in Russian).
Wool, S.M. (2007) Forensic authorship identification expertise: methodological foundations: Methodological manual. Kharkiv (in Russian).
Zemskaya, E.A. (1990) Speech portrait of a child (On the question of the systematicity of uncodified spheres of oral speech), 241-260.Moscow (inRussian).
Copyright (c) 2020 Ирина Мурса
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
