Legal Status of Collective Subjects of Scientific Work
Abstract
The article discusses the study of the legal status of collective subjects of scientific activity. The relevance of the research is predetermined by the importance of the qualitative organization of the work of collective subjects of scientific activity in order to achieve the most effective scientific results. The research methodology includes general methods of scientific research – systemic, logical, historical, as well as special methods, including comparative legal and formal legal. The formal legal method makes it possible to analyze the legal terminology on the research topic above. The method of comparative legal research allows us to compare different points of view and highlight the main problems of legal regulation of collective subjects of scientific law. The research includes three main stages: (1) – terminological analysis of the terminology used by the legislator; (2) – critical analysis of the legal definitions proposed by the legislator and the identification of the problems of legal regulation arising in this connection; (3) – comparison of controversial opinions and determination of ways to improve scientific legislation.
The main problems identified are the uncertainty in the delimitation of the statuses of related collective subjects of scientific work, as well as the mixing of scientific and educational functions of these organizations. As a result of the study, the authors have come to the conclusion that it is necessary to improve legislation aimed at regulating the legal status of scientific organizations and other collective subjects of scientific law.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Выручаев, А.А. Правовой статус Российской академии наук (современные правовые проблемы) / Известия Института государства и права РАН. – 2008. – С. 1 – 10.
Гаджиев, Г.А., Голиченков, А.К. Правовой статус Российской академии наук: с позиций конституционной экономики. – М., 2011. — 120 с.
Громова, Е.А. Некоторые проблемы Федерального закона «О государственно-частном партнерстве, муниципально-частном партнерстве в Российской Федерации и внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации» / Юрист. – 2017. – №10. – С. 15 – 18.
Груцына Л.Ю., Мирошникова В.А. Правовой статус научных организаций образовательных учреждений высшего профессионального образования / Финансы: теория и практика. – 2011. – С. 36 – 41.
Дидикин, А.Б. О реализации проектов государственно-частного партнерства в сфере науки, образования и промышленности / Юрист. – 2019. – №1. – С. 39 – 45.
Клеандров М. О совершенствовании правовой базы Российской академии наук / Государство и право. – 2020. – №3. – С. 24 – 36.
Луценко, С. О необходимом статусе Российской академии наук как юридического лица публичного права / Общество и экономика. – 2019. – №6. – С. 93 – 104.
Мозолин, В.П., Лафитский, В.И. О статусе Российской академии наук, Банка России и других юридических лиц в связи с проектом новой редакции Гражданского кодекса РФ / Законодательство и экономика. – 2011. – № 1. – С. 5 – 10.
О науке и государственной научно-технической политике : федеральный закон от 23 августа 1996 г. №127-ФЗ / Собрание законодательства РФ.
О Российской академии наук, реорганизации государственных академий наук и внесении изменений в некоторые законодательные акты Российской Федерации : федеральный закон от 27 сентября 2013 г. №253-ФЗ / Собрание законодательства РФ.
References
Didikin, A. B. (2019). On the implementation of public-private partnership projects in the fields of science, education and industry. Lawyer, 1, 39-45. (In Russian)
Gromova, E. A. (2017). Some problems of the Federal Law “On Public-Private Partnership, Municipal-Private Partnership in the Russian Federation and Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”. Lawyer, 10, 15-18. (In Russian)
Grutsyna, L. Yu., & Miroshnikova, V. A. (2011). Legal status of scientific organizations of educational institutions of higher professional education. Finance: theory and practice, 36-41. (In Russian)
Hajiyev, G. A., & Golichenkov, A. K. (2011). Legal status of the Russian Academy of Sciences: from the standpoint of constitutional economics. Moscow, Russia: Publishing house “Yustitsinform”. (In Russian)
Kleandrov M. (2020). On the improvement of legal basis of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 3, 24-36. (In Russian)
Lutsenko, S. (2019). On the necessary status of the Russian Academy of Sciences as a legal entity of public law. Society and Economy, 6, 93-104. (In Russian)
Mozolin, V. P., & Lafitsky, V. I. (2011). On the status of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Bank of Russia and other legal entities in connection with the draft of the new edition of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Legislation and Economics, 1, 5-10. (In Russian)
The State Duma. (1996). On science and state scientific and technical policy. (August 23, 1996). Moscow, Russia: Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation No. 127, 4137. (In Russian)
The State Duma. (2013). On the Russian Academy of Sciences, Reorganization of State Academies of Sciences and Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. (September 27, 2013) Moscow, Russia: Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation No. 253, 4883. (In Russian)
Vyruchaev, A. A. (2008). Legal status of the Russian Academy of Sciences (modern legal problems). Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1-10. (In Russian)
Copyright (c) 2021 Антон Васильев, Дариуш Шпоппер, Юлия Печатнова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
