Speech Strategies of Defamation (Based upon Experience of Forensic Linguists)

УДК 659.4:81’42 ББК Ш 100.3

DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2023)2723
Keywords: defamation strategy, repertoire of speech tactics, direct and indirect speech tactics

Abstract

The article considers the repertoire of direct and indirect speech tactics applied to implement strategy of defamation of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation employed to defend Russian Federation’s interests and its citizens’ interests, support international piece and safety; defamation of Russian government authorities executing defense of Russian Federation’s interests and its citizens’ interests. The material of research – video files, pictures, screenshots of the social nets, containing the signs of defamation. The method of discourse analysis, semantic analysis, motivation and target analysis are used in the research. The typical set of speech tactics of defamation strategy was revealed. The set is a certain basis for a linguist to qualify utterances as defamatory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Svetlana Zakharchenko, Surgut State Pedagogical University

Candidate of Philological Science, Associate Professor, associate professor of the department of linguistic education and cross-cultural communication

Vladislav Zasypkin , Surgut State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Sociology, Candidate of Philological Science, Associate Professor, Professor of the department of socio-economical education and philosophy

Tatiana Sirotkina , Surgut State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor of the department of philological education and journalistic

References

Баранов А. Н. Лингвистическая теория аргументации (когнитивный подход). М., 1989.

Баранов А. Н. Лингвистическая экспертиза текста: теоретические основания и практика: учеб. пособие. М., 2013.

Блакар Р. М. Язык как инструмент социальной власти / Язык и моделирование социального взаимодействия. – 1987. – С. 88-125.

Доронина С. В. «Командир! Может, договоримся?»: приемы дискурсивного анализа в лингвистической экспертизе текстов по антикоррупционным делам / Политическая лингвистика. – 2015. – № 3 (53). – С. 245-249.

Иссерс О. С. Паша-«Мерседес», или речевая стратегия дискредитации / Вестник Омского университета. – 1997. – №2. – URL: https://omsu.ru:8443/vestnik/articles/y1997-i2/a051/article.html

Карякин А. В. Стратегия дискредитации как способ реализации речевой агрессии / Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2. Языкознание. – 2009. – №2. – С. 163-167.

Методическое письмо «Об особенностях комплексных психолого-лингвистических судебных экспертиз информационных материалов, связанных с публичной дискредитацией использования Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации». М., 2022.

Руженцева Н. Б. Дискредитирующие тактики и приемы в российском политическом дискурсе: Монография. – Екатеринбург, 2004.

Сиворакша М. А. Дискредитация как разновидность конфликтного общения / Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. – 2007. – № 44. – С. 452-457.

Хабекирова З. С. Стратегия дискредитации и приемы ее реализации в политическом дискурсе демократической оппозиции / Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия 2: Филология и искусствоведение. – 2011. – №2. – С. 138-144.

Published
2023-04-01
How to Cite
Zakharchenko, S., Zasypkin , V., & Sirotkina , T. (2023). Speech Strategies of Defamation (Based upon Experience of Forensic Linguists). Legal Linguistics, (27(38), 130-135. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2023)2723
Issue
No 27(38) (2023): Юрислингвистика
Section
Speech Offenses

Copyright (c) 2023 Светлана Сергеевна Захарченко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .

2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.

3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).