EVALUATIVE CONCEPTS IN THE CIVIL PROCESS
Abstract
The article discusses the use of evaluative concepts in civil proceedings, as fixed both in the texts of normative acts and in doctrine. It has been proved that the absence of normative guidelines or concretization of the notion in acts of higher judicial agencies leads to contradictory judicial decisions, violates the uniformity of judicial practice and reduces guarantees for judicial protection of violated rights and safeguards. The authors classify and give general characteristics of categories that have blurred content. There are three groups of evaluative concepts: evaluative categories that are specified in the norms of the procedural code; evaluative concepts that do not have a normative definition, but are disclosed and specified in judicial acts of the highest judicial bodies of the Russian Federation; evaluation categories that are not disclosed both in procedural norms and judicial practice. The article emphasizes that established uniformity in the application of evaluation categories will minimize legal conflicts, gaps and contradictions, the multitude of which undermines the authority of the judicial power and violates the right for a fair trial.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Арбитражный процесс: учебник / отв. ред. В. В. Ярков. М., 2014.
Боннер А. Т. Советский закон и судебное усмотрение. Советское государство и право. 1979. № 6. С. 46–52.
Иеринг Р. Юридическая техника. М., 2008.
Осокина Г. Л. Гражданский процесс. Общая часть. М., 2008.
Папкова О. А. Усмотрение суда. М., 2005.
REFERENCES
Arbitration process: textbook / Ed. V. V. Yarkov [Arbitrazhnyj process: uchebnik]. Moscow, 2014.
Bonner A. T. Soviet law and judicial discretion [Sovetskij zakon i sudebnoe usmotrenie]. Soviet state and law. 1979. № 6. Pp. 46–52.
Iering R. Law machinery [Yuridicheskaya tekhnika]. Moscow, 2008.
Osokina G. L. The civil process. General part [Grazhdanskij process. Obshchaya chast']. Moscow, 2008.
Papkova O. A. Court review [Usmotrenie suda]. Moscow, 2005.
Copyright (c) 2018 Ирина Владимировна Рехтина, Михаил Алексеевич Боловнев
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
