Problematics of the Content of "Labor" Сonstitution Сategory
Abstract
The article discusses the constitutional category of «labour», the definition of which is not enshrined in legislative acts because it is considered to be a well-known category, which is not a special legal one and does not require any clarification. However, this approach creates difficulties for legal regulation, as it blurs the boundaries for the legislator and the executor. Lack of awareness of the concept of a regulated category can lead to a situation when the legislator, creating a new law or making amendments to an existing one, will subject to regulation the area that does not pertain to the relevant legal phenomenon, or vice versa - will ignore part of the content of the regulated category, which is certain to negatively affect the quality of legal regulation. Law enforcement practices similarly face difficulties in having only doctrinal understandings of statutory concepts, which creates inconsistency in decisions made by lawyers in course of their professional work. The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation enshrined the category of «labour» in a number of articles, but did not clarify the interpretation of its concept. The analysis of economic and legal views on labor allows us to conclude that, despite the status of a well-known category, which, it would seem, does not need an explanation, only the presence of clear criteria for recognizing an activity as labor, provides high-quality legal regulation, in particular, it allows not only to separate the types of activities that are not subject to legal regulation, but also to choose the right branch of law that regulates social relations in each particular case.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Литература
Александров Н.Г. Трудовое правоотношение. М., 1948.
Аристотель. О возникновении животных / пер. В.П. Карпов. Москва – Ленинград. 1940.
Бердяев Н.А. О назначении человека. М., 1993.
Волков Ю.Е. Труд в глобальном мире / Труд и социальные отношения. – 2005. – № 4. – С. 54.
Гегель Г.В.Ф. Сочинения. В 13 т. Т 3. М., 1930.
Генкин Б.М. Экономика и социология труда. М., 2005.
Далин В.М. ГракхБабёф накануне и во время Великой французской революции. М., 2013.
Деева Е.А. Специфика принудительного труда в России / Актуальные проблемы экономики, социологии и права. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 26.
Драчук М.А. Понятие и виды труда в организации юридического механизма управления трудом / Вестник Омского университета. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 391.
Зайцева О.Б., Беребина О.П., Черепанцева Ю.С. Учебный курс трудового права для студентов юридических вузов. Оренбург, 2010.
Конституция СССР. Политико-правовой комментарий / под общ. ред. Б.Н. Пономаревой. М., 1982.
Лушников А.М., Лушникова М.В. Курс трудового права. В 2 т. Т. 1. М., 2009.
Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. В 50 т. Т 23. М., 1960.
Маршалл А. Основы экономической науки. М., 2007.
Одегов Ю.Г., Руденко Г.Г., Бабынина Л.С. Экономика труда. В 2 т. Т. 1. М., 2007.
Остапенко Ю.М. Экономика труда. М., 2007.
Райзберг Б.А. Прикладная экономика. М., 2010.
Российское трудовое право / отв. ред. А.Д. Зайкин. М., 1997.
Рофе А.И. Экономика труда. М., 2010.
Трудовое право / под ред. В.М. Лебедева. М., 2011.
Экономика и социология труда / под ред. А.Я. Кибинова. М., 2007.
Экономика труда / под ред. П.Э. Шлендера, Ю.П. Кокина. М., 2002.
Экономика труда и социально-трудовые отношения / под ред. Г.Г. Меликьяна, Р.П. Колосовой. М., 1996.
Экономическая энциклопедия / под ред. Л.И. Абалкина. М., 1999.]
References
Alexandrov, N.G. (1948). Labor relations. Moscow (in Russian).
Aristotle. About the origin of animals (1940). Translation by V.P. Karpov. Moscow - Leningrad. (in Russian).
Berdyaev, N.A. (1993). About the appointment of a person. Moscow (in Russian).
Volkov, Yu.E. (2005). Labor in the global world. Labor and social relations, 4, 54. (in Russian).
Hegel, G.V.F. (1930). Compositions. In 13 volumes. V. 3. Moscow (in Russian).
Genkin, B.M. (2005). Economics and Sociology of Labor. Moscow (in Russian).
Dalin, V.M. (2013). Gracchus Babeuf on the eve and during the French Revolution. Moscow (in Russian).
Deeva, E.A. (2016). Specificity of forced labor in Russia. Actual problems of economics, sociology and law, 1, 26. (in Russian).
Drachuk, M.A. (2012). The concept and types of labor in the organization of the legal mechanism of labor management. Bulletin of Omsk University, 3, 391. (in Russian).
Zaitseva, OB, Berebina, OP, Cherepantseva, Yu. S. (2010). Training course of labor law for students of law schools. Orenburg. (in Russian).
The Constitution of the USSR. Political and legal commentary (1982). B.N. Ponomareva (ed.). Moscow. (in Russian).
Lushnikov, A.M., Lushnikova, M.V. (2009). Labor law course. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow. (in Russian).
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1960). Works. In 50 v. V. 23. Moscow. (in Russian).
Marshall, A. (2007) Fundamentals of economic science. Moscow. (in Russian).
Odegov, Yu.G., Rudenko, G.G., Babynina, L.S. (2007). Labor economics. In 2 volumes.Vol. 1. Moscow. (in Russian).
Ostapenko, Yu.M. (2007). Labor economics. Moscow. (in Russian).
Raizberg, B.A. (2010). Applied Economics. Moscow. (in Russian).
Russian labor law. (1997). A.D. Zaikin (ed.). Moscow. (in Russian).
Rofe, A.I. (2010). Labor economics. Moscow. (in Russian).
Labor law. (2011). V.M. Lebedev (ed.). Moscow. (in Russian).
Economics and sociology of labor (2007). A. Ya.Kibinov (ed.). Moscow. (in Russian).
Labor Economics. (2002). P.E. Shlender, Yu.P. Kokin (ed.). Moscow. (in Russian).
Labor economics and social and labor relations. (1996). G.G. Melikyan, R.P. Kolosova (ed.). Moscow. (in Russian).
Economic encyclopedia. (1999). L.I. Abalkin (ed.). Moscow. (inRussian).
Copyright (c) 2021 Анна Канакова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
