The Terms "Science" and "Scolarly Endeavor” in Legal Texts and Doctrine

Keywords: language of law, legal technology, science, scholarly endeavor, science law, legal relations in science

Abstract

The study examines the concept of "science" through the prism of the language of law and legal doctrine. The authors claim the need to put down the working definition of science in legal acts, since this term has a practical meaning when qualifying certain relations as scientific. The article draws attention to the vagueness of the concept of "science" in the Russian legislation, the absence of such a feature as the creative nature of scientific knowledge in the legal definition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Anton Vasiliev, Altay State University
Doctor of Law, Director of the Law Institute of Altai State University
Dariush Schopper, Pomor Academy, Slupsk, Poland
Doctor of Law, Department of History of State and Law of Poland, History of Political and Legal Doctrines

References

Городов О.А. Правовая инноватика. Правовое регулирование инновационной деятельности. СПб., 2008.

Международные нормативные акты ЮНЕСКО. М., 1993.

Мурзин Д.В. Проблемы правового регулирования научной деятельности как деятельности творческой / Российский юридический журнал. – 2019. – № 4.– С. 167-175.

Мурзин Д.В. Правовая природа результатов научной деятельности / Российское право: образование, практика и наука. – 2019. – № 2. – С. 15.

Рекомендация ЮНЕСКО 2017 «В отношении научной деятельности и научных работников». / Организация Объединенных Наций по вопросам образования, науки и культуры. Акты Генеральной конференции. Т.1. Резолюция. 39-я сессия. Париж, 2018.

Стёпин В.С. Философия науки. Общие проблемы. М., 2006.

Федеральный закон от 23.08.1996 N 127-ФЗ (ред. от 31.07.2020) "О науке и государственной научно-технической политике"/ Собрание законодательства РФ. 26.08.1996 г., N 35, ст. 4137.

Черникова И.В. Природа науки и критерии научности / Гуманитарный вектор. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 94.

Черникова И.В. Философия и история науки. Томск, 2011.

References

Chernikova, I.V. (2012). The nature of science and criteria of scientific character. Humanitarian vector. No. 3. (in Russian).

Chernikova I.V. (2011). Philosophy and history of science. Tomsk (in Russian).

Federal Law of 23.08.1996 N 127-FZ (as amended on 31.07.2020) "On Science and State Scientific and Technical Policy". Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 26.08.1996. No. 35. Art. 4137 (in Russian).

Gorodov, O.A. (2008). Legal innovation. Legal regulation of innovation. St. Petersburg (in Russian).

International normative acts of UNESCO (1993). Moscow (in Russian).

Murzin, D.V. (2019). Problems of legal regulation of scientific activity as creative activity. Russian legal journal. No. 4 (in Russian).

Murzin, D.V. (2019). The legal nature of the results of scientific activity. Russian law: education, practice and science. No. 2 (in Russian).

Stepin, V. S. (2006). Philosophy of Science. Common problems. Moscow (in Russian).

UNESCO Recommendation 2017 “Concerning Scientific Activities and Scientific Workers” (2018). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. General Conference Records. Vol. 1. Resolution. 39th session. Paris (in Russian).

Published
2020-10-01
How to Cite
Vasiliev, A., & Schopper, D. (2020). The Terms "Science" and "Scolarly Endeavor” in Legal Texts and Doctrine. Legal Linguistics, (17 (28), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2020)1701