Ancient Chinese Political and Legal Thought about Rewards and Punishments

Keywords: Confucianism, Legalism, rewards, punishment, ancient China

Abstract

The article discusses ancient Chinese political and legal thought. In the modern world, such political and legal teachings as Confucianism, Taoism and Legalism have gained wide spread and influence. They occupy a special place in the spiritual culture of China and the life of modern Chinese society.

The PRC is at the stage of further modernization of Chinese society, which was initiated by the reforms of the 1970s. Traditional for China in any era of its development has been the appeal to the achievements of Chinese civilization.

One of the problems considered by the representatives of ancient Chinese political and legal thought is the problem of state administration. Among the various methods of government, ancient Chinese thinkers singled out, first of all, rewards and punishments. Within the framework of the political and legal views of ancient China, there were several approaches to rewards and punishments. The Confucians opposed the administration of the state on the basis of laws containing severe punishments. They believed that government should be based not on punishments, but on rewards. Supporters of Taoism recognized the method of rewards and punishments in government, but treated it negatively. In Mohism, ideas are expressed about the need to combine violent methods of control with moral forms of influence on people. Legalists come to the unequivocal conclusion that punishments are the most effective method of governing society.

The article concludes that the system of severe punishments developed by the Legalists underwent changes in the direction of mitigation and connection with the main postulates of Confucianism during the Han Empire. A system of severe punishments, coercion and violence, in a somewhat relaxed version, became the basis for the work of government bodies in subsequent centuries of Chinese history.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Oksana Moiseeva, Altay State University

Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Associate Professor

Olga Blinova, Altay State University

Department of Constitutional and International Law, Associate Professor

References

Антология мировой правовой мысли. Т.1. М., 1999.

Бичурин Н.Я. Китай в гражданском и нравственном уложении. М., 2002.

Древнекитайская философия. Т.1. М., 1994.

Древнекитайская философия. Т.2. М., 1994.

Жерне Ж. Древний Китай. М., 2004.

История китайской философии. М., 1989.

История политических и правовых учений. Древний мир. М., 1985.

Классическое конфуцианство. Т.2. СПб., М., 2000.

Конфуций. Я верю в древность. М., 1998.

Маршев В.И. История управленческой мысли. М., 2005.

Рубин В.А. Личность и власть в Древнем Китае. М., 1999.

Торчинов Е.А. Даосизм. «Дао – Дэ цзин». СПб.,1999.

Фицджералд Ч.П. История Китая. М., 2008.

Феоктистов В.Ф. Философские и общественно-политические взгляды Сюнь-цзы. М., 1976.

Царьков И.И. Уголовная политика древних цивилизаций / Право и политика. - 2010. - № 8. - С. 1480-1492.

Шан Ян. Книга правителя области Шан. М.,1993.

Published
2022-07-01
How to Cite
Moiseeva, O., & Blinova, O. (2022). Ancient Chinese Political and Legal Thought about Rewards and Punishments. Legal Linguistics, (24 (35), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2022)2405
Section
Legal hermeneutics