The Problem of Understanding the Evaluative Concepts of Civil Law: the Ratio of Natural and Legal Language

УДК 340, ББК 67.0

  • Tatiana Platunova Altai State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-5364 Email: taplatunova@yandex.ru
  • Ulyana Pleshivtseva Altai State Pedagogical University Email: ulyana.pleshivceva@mail.ru
  • Tatiana Borodulina Altai State Pedagogical University Email: borodulina@yandex.ru
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2023)3007
Keywords: evaluative concepts, legal language, natural language, civil law, linguistics

Abstract

The article covers the problem of understanding evaluative concepts in civil law and legal linguistics. There have been attempts of civil studies to consider categories of evaluative concepts and propose their applied classifications. However, the problem of the presence and systematic interpretation of evaluative concepts in the legal sphere remains practically unresolved. In this article, we have made an attempt to identify the reason for the emergence and active use of evaluative concepts in civil law. This study answers the questions of what is meant by the concept of value in law and for what purpose it can be applied. We explored the main academic debate on the problem of evaluative concepts in law and linguistics, and then revealed that the evaluative concept is interpreted differently in these branches of knowledge and a possible convergence of understanding will cause great practical problems in law enforcement practice. The debate of linguists is caused by the basic idea that evaluative concepts have different, relative connotations, while lawyers strive to most clearly fix the phenomena of reality in evaluative concepts. The study identifies the characteristic features of evaluative concepts in the legal sphere and linguistics, which makes it possible to distinguish between interpretations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Tatiana Platunova, Altai State University

Department of Civil Law, Altai State University

Ulyana Pleshivtseva , Altai State Pedagogical University

Master's student, Altai State University

Tatiana Borodulina , Altai State Pedagogical University

Department of Jurisprudence and Methods of Teaching Socio-Economic Disciplines, Altai State Pedagogical University

References

Афанасьева А. А. «Проблемы использования оценочных понятий в российском праве» / GLOSSA: Вестник студенческой науки. Издание кафедры теории и истории государства и права Курского государственного университета. - 2019 - С. 183-185.

Бочкова А. Л. Понятие "Оценка" в лингвистике. Карповские научные чтения: сб. науч. ст. Вып. 7: в 2 ч. Ч. 1 / Минск, 2013. С. 280-283.

Вильнянский С. И. Применение норм советского права / Ученые записки Харьковского юридического института. Вып. 7. Харьков, 1956.

Гайрамович Д. А. Оценочные понятия в современном гражданском праве / Цивилистические записки: межвузовский сборник научных трудов. Москва, 2001.

Гражданский кодекс РФ Часть 1. ГК РФ Статья 166. Оспоримые и ничтожные сделки. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/44c14b6900a9357b7280c62327f3bfdf1743a52c/

Голубцов В. Г. Оценочные понятия в российских кодификациях гражданского права / LEX RUSSICA. - 2019. - № 8. URL: https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/883

Давыдова М. Л. Юридическая техника: проблемы теории и методологии. Монография. Волгоград, 2009.

Жеребкин В. Е. Логический анализ понятий права. Киев, 1976.

Голев Н. Д. Юридический аспект языка в лингвистическом освещении. 1. О предмете юрислингвистики / Юрислингвистика-1: проблемы и перспективы: Межвузовский сборник научных трудов. Барнаул, 1999. URL: http://lingvo.asu.ru/golev/articles/v81.html .

Кудрявцев В. Н. Теоретические основы квалификации преступлений. 1963. URL: https://studfile.net/preview/9787972/page:15/

Майборода Т. Ю. К вопросу о классификации оценочных понятий в гражданском праве / Universum: Экономика и юриспруденция: электрон. научн. журнал. - 2019. - № 8-9(65). URL: http://7universum.com/ru/economy/archive/item/7752

Национальный корпус русского языка. URL: https://ruscorpora.ru/results?search=CmIqGAoICAAQChgyIAoQBSAAQAVqBDAuOTV4ADICCAE6AQFCPwo9CjsKA3JlcRI0CjLQryDQvNC10YfRgtCw0Lsg0LIg0LTQtdGC0YHRgtCy0LUg0L4g0LLQtdC70LjQutC1LDAB

Опалев Р. О. Оценочные понятия в арбитражном и гражданском процессуальном праве. 2008. URL: https://static.freereferats.ru/_avtoreferats/01004040786.pdf

Постановление Пленума Верховного Суда Российской Федерации от 23.06 2015 № 25 О применении судами некоторых положений раздела 1ГКРФ. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_181602/

Проект гражданского уложения Российской империи.. - Санкт-Петербург. Сенат. Тип. 1809. URL: https://www.prlib.ru/item/361092

Рясина А. Л. Оценочные понятия в российском праве: современные подходы / Актуальные проблемы российского права. - 2015. - №3(52). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenochnye-kategorii-v-rossiyskom-prave-sovremennye-podhody.

Published
2023-12-29
How to Cite
Platunova, T., Pleshivtseva , U., & Borodulina , T. (2023). The Problem of Understanding the Evaluative Concepts of Civil Law: the Ratio of Natural and Legal Language. Legal Linguistics, (30(41), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2023)3007
Issue
No 30(41) (2023): Legal Linguistics
Section
Legal Techniques

Copyright (c) 2023 Татьяна Платунова, Ульяна Плешивцева, Татьяна Бородулина

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .

2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.

3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).