On the Interpretation of Legal Norms
УДК 340, ББК 67.0
Abstract
The scientific research discusses a comprehensive analysis of the interpretation of legal texts that have their own specifics in comparison with ordinary ones, containing special legal terminology and laid out according to the rules of legal technique. The norms of law contained in normative legal acts are subject to interpretation, exclusively in accordance with other norms of law and taking into account the principles of legal science. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the fact that legal norms regulate relations arising in society and are addressed primarily to people. Due to the development of public relations, they need precise legal regulation and the creation of conditions for uniform law enforcement. Interpretation is a process of mental activity aimed at understanding the meaning of legal norms. A correct and unambiguous interpretation of the norms of law will allow not only to study them, understand their authentic meaning, but also to get into the spirit of law and its fundamental principles in general. The paper examines the concept of interpretation of legal norms, types and methods of interpretation, as well as identifies the peculiarities of interpretation by the body of supreme constitutional justice, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, and notes its important role in ensuring uniformity of law enforcement. The presence of defects in legal acts requires reopening the issue of improving activities that allow correcting and replenishing the provisions of regulatory legal acts. The article analyzes approaches to the interpretation of legal norms, identifies problems of interpretation. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that the correct interpretation of legal norms is necessary. For these purposes, the author proposes the use of different methods of interpretation in combination.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Биюшкина Н. И., Гук П. А. Нормотворческая деятельность высших судебных органов Российского государства: историко-правовой аспект / Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Общественные науки. – 2022. – № 2 (62). – С. 117–132.
Власенко Н. А., Залоило М. В. Конкретизация и толкование права как творческое содержание судебной практики / Журнал российского права. – 2016. – № 8 (236). – С. 43–57.
Вопленко Н. Н. Официальное толкование норм права. М., 1976.
Гандалоев Р. Б., Грудцына Л. Ю. Теория судебного толкования / Образование и право. – 2020. – № 10. – С. 16–23.
Гук П. А. Судебное толкование норм права / Журнал российского права. – 2016. – № 8 (236). – С. 72–78.
Гук П. А., Коршунова П. В. Единство судебной практики как особая ценность правосудия / Журнал российского права. – 2020. – № 12. – С. 103–118.
Залоило М. В., Малютин Н. С. Толкование и конкретизация как универсальные формы эволюции права / Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2015. – № 4 (53). – С. 84–90.
Зорькин В. Д. Россия и Конституция в XXI в. М., 2008.
Линько В. В. Влияние глобализации на применение судебного прецедента в Российской Федерации / Государство и право. – 2021. – № 6. – С. 199–204.
Матузов Н. И., Малько А. В. Теория государства и права : учебник. М., 2004.
Малютин Н. С. Судебное толкование нормативных правовых актов в Российской Федерации: конституционно-правовой аспект : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.02. М., 2016.
Марченко М. Н. Теория государства и права : учебник. М., 2018.
Терехина Е. А. Толкование и конкретизация норм права судебными органами / Электронный научный журнал «Наука. Общество. Государство». – 2023. Т. 11 – № 2. – С. 14–23.
Copyright (c) 2024 Олеся Казанцева
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
