Values of Contract Law Discourse and Their Types
УДК 811.161.1:347.44, ББК 81.053.2+67.404
Abstract
The article discusses the relevant issues in respect of the analysis of the contract law discourse values. The theoretical relevance of the research is due to the demand for the results of the integrative understanding of the problems within the scope of the axiological linguistics and the axiology of law studying the values of discourse, on the one hand, and of the legal values themselves, on the other hand. The author proposes the solution to these problems by analyzing of the value content of such basic linguistic cultural concepts of contract law discourse as «property», «work», «services» and «money». These concepts are representative of the benefits that constitute the object of a contract and they are related to the fourth level of the law values hierarchy.
The Belarusian companies and organizations’ contracts for the provision of services were selected and considered to identify the value specifics of the concept «services». The comprehensive conceptual and discourse analysis of the documents has made it possible to identify the values they are based on. In accordance with the current legal and regulatory acts in the Republic of Belarus the legal, ethical and pragmatic types of the values reflected in the contract law discourse were distinguished and their essence was disclosed.
To identify the value specifics of such a concept as «services» the Belarusian companies and organizations’ contracts for the provision of services were selected and considered. The comprehensive conceptual and discourse analysis of the documents has made it possible to identify the values they are based on. In accordance with the legal and regulatory acts that are in force in the Republic of Belarus the legal, ethical and pragmatic types of the values reflected in the contract law discourse were distinguished and their essence was disclosed.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Бахтин М. М. К философии поступка / Философия и социология науки и техники: ежегодник. М., 1986.
Гаджиев Г. А. Договор как общеправовая ценность (к вопросу о генезисе юридической эпистемиологии) / Журнал российского права. - 2019. - № 1. - С. 5–18.
Горобец К. В. Аксиосфера права: философский и юридический дискурс: моногр. Одесса, 2013.
Гражданский кодекс Республики Беларусь, 7 дек. 1998 г. № 218-З (с изм. и доп.). URL: https://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=hk9800218.
Закон Республики Беларусь о защите прав потребителей, 9 янв. 2002 г. №90-З (с изм. и доп.). URL: https://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=H10200090.
Карасик В. И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград, 2002.
Карасик В. И. Лингвокультурные ценности в дискурсе / Иностранные языки в высшей школе. - 2015. - №1. - С. 25-35.
Ковалевская И. И. Концептуализация дискурса договорного права и ее применение в переводе / Вестник МГЛУ. Сер 1. Филология. - 2023. - №1 (122). - С. 7-14.
Конституция Республики Беларусь, 1994 (с изм. и доп.). URL: https://pravo.by/pravovaya-informatsiya/normativnye-dokumenty/konstitutsiya-respubliki-belarus.
Маслова В. А. Концепты и ценности: содержание понятий, языковая репрезентация / Ученые записки Таврического национального университета им. В. И. Вернадского. Серия «Филология. Социальные коммуникации». Том 24 (63), 2011. - №2. Часть 1. - С. 383-387.
Поляков А. В. Коммуникативное правопонимание: Избранные труды. СПб., 2014.
Федулова М. Н. Система концептов в юридическом дискурсе / Вопросы психолингвистики. 2017. - №4 (34). - С. 107-113.
Храмцова Н. Г. Концепты «закон» и «субъект права» в правовом дискурсе / Общество и право. - 2007. - №4 (18). - С. 27-32.
Храмцова Н. Г. Правовой дискурс в теории права / Бизнес в законе. Экономико-юридический журнал. - 2009. - № 1. - С. 80-84.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ирина Ковалевская
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors, which are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. Authors retain the copyright to the work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication along with the work, at the same time licensing it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this work with the obligatory indication of the authorship of this work and a link to the original publication in this journal .
2. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published by this journal (for example, to place it in the university depository or to publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed to post their work on the Internet (for example, in a university repository or on their personal website) before and during the review process of this journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion, as well as more links to this published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
